Thursday, November 7, 2013

WEEK 6 EOC: Supreme Court Prayer



Our topic today comes to us from Greece, New York, where town meetings have been opened with Prayer for well over a decade. It became an issue when two attendee’s, Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens, thought “They should not have to be subjected to sectarian prayers.”

Now, personally, I agree with them. There is no possible way to make a prayer, vocally, to an audience of all different faiths and religions, that will NOT offend someone. An easier method which would allow each and every one to have their own moment to pray, or not to pray, would be a “moment of silence”. Which the town had in place up until 1999. When they started to allow prayer.

Just recently I was asked to stand while a college read a prayer, I’m told it was the same prayer brought up in this topic. Several others refused to stand, and personally I felt extremely awkward while standing, as I am agnostic. I don’t formally recognize any faith as my own, yet I stood to avoid drawing attention. In the back of my mind I was a bit upset. Why should I have to be subjected to this? My faith might not even be the same as the speaker. How does he feel knowing that there are some in his audience that don’t believe him? Later we were told the “Why” to his prayer, and then I was more understanding, but that doesn’t change the fact that I was surprised it happened at all.

Of course, the first amendment, freedom of speech, as well as freedom of religion, could be used to defend the prayers. However, with how much the country has changed in the 200 years since its establishment, should we really use prayer in a public setting outside of designated area’s such as a church?

An interesting quote I found from Douglass Laycock, a defendant of the prayers, was

I suppose that’s true enough, but what of Atheists, Agnostics, or even Jedi? Whom seemingly have no rights to preach their religion?

No comments:

Post a Comment